# 17. Small Oscillations

*Michael Fowler*

## Particle in a Well

We begin with the one-dimensional case of a particle oscillating about a local minimum of the potential energy We'll assume that near the minimum, call it , the potential is well described by the leading second-order term, , so we're taking the zero of potential at assuming that the second derivative , and (for now) neglecting higher order terms.

To simplify the equations, we'll also move theorigin to , so

replacing the second derivative with the standard "spring constant" expression.

This equation has solution

(This can, of course, also be derived from the Lagrangian, easily shown to be )

### Two Coupled Pendulums

We'll take two equal pendulums, coupled by a light spring. We take the spring restoring force to be directly proportional to the angular difference between the pendulums. (This turns out to be a good approximation.)

For small angles of oscillation, we take the Lagrangian to be

Denoting the single pendulum frequency by , the equations of motion are (writing , so )

We look for a periodic solution, writing

(The final physical angle solutions will be the real part.)

The equations become (in matrix notation):

Denoting the matrix by

This is an eigenvector equation, with the eigenvalue, found by the standard procedure:

Solving, that is,

The corresponding eigenvectors are and .

### Normal Modes

The physical motion corresponding to the amplitudes eigenvector has two constants of integration (amplitude and phase), often written in terms of a single complex number, that is,

with real.

Clearly, this is the mode in which the two pendulums are in sync, oscillating at their natural frequency, with the spring playing no role.

In physics, this mathematical eigenstate of the matrix is
called a *normal mode*** **of oscillation. In a normal mode, all parts
of the system oscillate at a single frequency, given by the eigenvalue.

The other normal mode,

where we have written .
Here the system is oscillating with the single frequency , the pendulums are now exactly *out *of
phase, so when they part the spring pulls them back to the center, thereby
increasing the system oscillation frequency.

The matrix structure can be clarified by separating out the spring contribution:

All vectors are eigenvectors of the identity, of course, so the first matrix just contributes to the eigenvalue. The second matrix is easily found to have eigenvalues are 0,2, and eigenstates and .

### Principle of Superposition

The equations of motion are *linear *equations, meaning
that if you multiply a solution by a constant, that's still a solution, and if
you have two different solutions to the equation, the sum of the two is also a
solution. This is called the *principle of superposition*.

The general motion of the system is therefore

where it is understood thatare complex numbers and the physical motion is the real part.

This is a four-parameter solution: the initial positions and velocities can be set arbitrarily, completely determining the motion.

*Exercise*: begin with one pendulum straight down, the
other displaced, both momentarily at rest. Find values forand describe the subsequent motion.

*Solution*: At the
pendulums are at Take This
ensures zero initial velocities too, since the physical parameters are the real
parts of the complex solution, and at the initial instant the derivatives are
pure imaginary.

The solution for the motion of the first pendulum is

.

and for small ,

Here the pendulum is oscillating at approximately , but the second term sets the overall
oscillation amplitude: it's slowly varying, going to zero periodically (at
which point the *other* pendulum has maximum kinetic energy).

*To think about*: What happens if the two have
different masses? Do we still get these beats -- can the larger pendulum
transfer all its kinetic energy to the smaller?

*Exercise*: try pendulums of different lengths, hung so
the bobs are at the same level, small oscillation amplitude, same spring as
above.

### Three Coupled Pendulums

Let's now move on to the case of three equal mass coupled pendulums, the middle one connected to the other two, but they're not connected to each other.

The Lagrangian is

Putting,

The equations of motion are

Putting , the equations can be written in matrix form

The normal modes of oscillation are given by the eigenstates of that second matrix.

The one obvious normal mode is all the pendulums swinging together, at the original frequency , so the springs stay at the rest length and play no role. For this mode, evidently the second matrix has a zero eigenvalue, and eigenvector .

The full eigenvalue equation is

that is, so the eigenvalues are , with frequencies

The normal mode eigenvectors satisfy

They are , normalizing them to unity.

The equations of motion are linear, so the general solution is a superposition of the normal modes:

### Normal Coordinates

Landau writes . (Actually he brings in an intermediate variable , but we'll skip that.) These "normal coordinates" can have any amplitude and phase, but oscillate at a single frequency The components of the above vector equation read:

It's worth going through the exercise of writing the Lagrangian in terms of the normal coordinates:

recall

Putting in the above expressions for the , after some algebra,

We've achieved a separation of variables. The Lagrangian is manifestly a sum of three simple harmonic oscillators, which can have independent amplitudes and phases. Incidentally, this directly leads to the action angle variables -- recall that for a simple harmonic oscillator the action and the angle is that of rotation in phase space.

### Three Equal Pendulums Equally Coupled

What if we had a third identical spring connecting the two end pendulums (we could have small rods extending down so the spring went below the middle pendulum?

What would the modes of oscillation look like in this case?

Obviously, all three swinging together is still an option, the eigenvector , corresponding to eigenvalue zero of the "interaction matrix" above. But actually we have to extend that matrix to include the new spring -- it's easy to check this gives the equation:

The equation for the eigenvalues is easily found to be Putting into
the matrix yields the equation This is telling us
that any vector perpendicular to the all-swinging-together vector is an eigenvector. This is because the
other two eigenvectors have the same eigenvalue, meaning that any linear
combination of them also has that eigenvalue -- this is a *degeneracy*.

Think about the physical situation. If we set the first two pendulums swinging exactly out of phase, the third pendulum will feel no net force, so will stay at rest. But we could equally choose another pair. And, the eigenvector we found before is still an eigenvector: it's in this degenerate subspace, equal to .